You honestly can't say that my post in response to RNT's original thread "slammed" him. I posted that I disagreed with the attitude he was taking and pointed out that the moderators had a perfectly valid reason for banning him.
That post was then followed by 3 or 4 posts which could fall under the umbrella of "slamming", but it was all coming in my direction.
Another way to look at it is that RNT's original post was "slamming" a group of people or website that I happen to like and enjoy. They're not here to defend themselves, so I posted defending their actions. This seems to have pissed off a ton of people here.
So, basically, you're saying that it's OK for anyone but me to voice an opinion. If you don't like my posting style, I'm not about to appologize for it. I actually spend some time re-reading what I've written to try and ensure that what I'm posting is clear and articulates what I want to say.
haveblue - I'll just not respond to your post. I don't agree with what you've said and you seem to think the best thing for me to do if I disagree with your post is to not post anything. This ignores that fact that your post was in disagreement with my post so you were breaking your own guideline by posting in the first place. Thanks for the help. I'm just not going to respond to what you're not saying.
|